Evidence 01 Strafanzeige der BJB - Complaint of Bank Julius Baer & Co. AG, Zurich
Evidence 2 Insurance Agreement "Expatriate Agreement"
Evidence 3 Employment Contract JBBT-GCM "Assignement as Chief Operating Officer"
Evidence 04 Defence explain Swiss Bank Secrecy is not applicable
Judge Dr. Zweifel - Solidary Confinement (30 days)
Evidence 06 Backdating judge Dr. Zweifel - solidary confinement (30 days)
Evidence 07 Decision PROC Bergmann - Swiss Bank Secrecy case should be closed
Evidence 08 Royal Cayman Islands Police already performs an investigatioon with FBI
Evidence 09 Interrogations Lawyer Ch. Hiestand and his lies
Evidence 10 Closing the criminal case against Bank Julius Baer & Co. AG, Zurich
Evidence 11 Interrogation of lawyer Ch. Hiestand and his lies
Evidence 12 Higher Court protects lawyer Ch. Hiestand and the bank
Evidence 13 Federal Court protects BJB-ZRH and lawyer Ch. Hiestand
Evidence 14 Higher Prosecution Office does not make a deicsion on Swiss Bank Secrecy
Evidence 15 Closing legal Case against Management of BJB-ZRH
Evidence 16 letter of BJB_ZRH Rudolf Elmer is not employed by Julius Baer Bank & Co. AG, Zurich
Evidence 17 Complaint of Elmer against BJB-ZRH Criminal Organisation
clients in English on page 9 onwards
Evidence 18 Federal Prosecution Office turns down complaint and informs BJB-ZRH
Details of client names such as Acosta Chapparo etc.
Evidence 19 Federal Prosecution Office one page for Elmer turning down complaint
no client names
Evidence 20 Indictment 25. Jun 2010
no Swiss Bank accounts in the indictment, no evidence
Evidence 21 Verdict Lower Court of Zurich 19. Jan 2010
no Swiss Bank Accounts in the verdict
Evidence 22 Judge Zatti solidary confinement 187 days
Evidence 23 Higher Court of Zurich judge Dr. Marti confirmed solidary confinement 187 days
Evidence 24 Judge Hürlimann confirms solidary confinement 187 days
Evidence 25 Judge Fleischer confirms solidary confinement 187 days
Evidence 26 Judge Erb confirms solidary confinement 187 days to Oct 1st, 2011
Evidence 27 Higher Court appeal ruling 17. Nov 2011
no verdict, judges do not know what sort of data is involved, employment situation not reviewed
Evidence 28 Final Report of the additional investigations after 17. Nov 2011 appeal ruling
Evidence 29 materially revised indictment under guideance of Higher Court
Evidence 30 Position of Mario Tuor SIF state secretary
Evidence 31 Indictment related to WikiLeaks Frontline Club and 2008
Evidence 32 Verdict Lower Court
Evidence 33 Evaluation of Prof Dr. Geiser in respect of employment situation
Evidence 34 Minutes of the Lower Court 15. Jan 2015
Evidence 35 Verdict of the Higher Court - Swiss Bank Secrecy cannot be applied
Evidence 36 Work Elmer should have performed within 4 weeks prior to the Court Trial
Reason why he broke down!
Beschwerde Bundesgericht Hiestand 24. Oktober 2017
Sonntagszeitung Justizskandal turned
JBs Brief and Staatsanwaltschaft Arbeitsverhältnis
GP 01 Kherfouche
GP 02 Abweisung Strafanzeige Frauenfelder 2007
GP 03 Stranzeige 2004
GP 04 Strafanzeige 04
GP 05 Weiterleitung Strafanzeige STA Schwyz zu Zürich
GP 06 Nötigung Polizeirapport 2005
GP 07 Aerztliche Zeugnis Prof Schnyder
GP 08 Auszug Gerichtspsychiater Kiesewetter
GP 09 Willkürrüge Bundesgericht
GP 10 OG Urteil betr Kiesewetter, Bergmann Müller 2014
GP 11 Stellungnahme STA Dr. Bucher
GP 12 Stellungnahme Dr. Seidle Staatsanwaltschaft
GP 13 Strafanzeige Dr. Kiesewetter OBST
Eingabe BG durch Oberstaatsanwaltschaft Zch Peter Pellegrini
Beschwerde Bankgeheimnisverletzung
Invoices State of Zurich
Zürcher Staat
Complaint to the President of the ECHR
Turning down the 4th complaint
Totales Systemversagen in der Schweiz!
Süddeutsche Zeitung : zu gross um Umzufallen! 23.3.2023